Thinking About Earth as a Planet
SCIED 411 Lesson Plan
Evaluation Form
|
|
|
|
|
|
Source Information |
The authors of the lesson
are clearly indicated, as well as the source of the lesson plan. Sample citations for published
lessons: .http://www.nsrconline.org/pdf/EIS_TG_sample_1.pdf (no author apparent) |
5 |
2 |
|
Grade level and topic |
Is the grade level and
general topic of the lesson clearly indicated and appropriate? |
5 |
2 |
|
Standards and inquiry |
Is at least one relevant
State or National science or environmental education standard clearly
identified, and is it substantively addressed in the lesson? |
5 |
2 |
|
Instructional objectives |
Is it clear from the
statement of the lesson objectives what a student should be able to do as a
result of completing the lesson? |
10 |
5 |
|
Materials, equipment, and set-up |
Are the materials and
equipment needed for this lesson described clearly enough that another
teacher could set it up and carry it out? |
10 |
9 |
|
Body of the Lesson If evaluating a unit or an entire curriculum, look for the following elements in at least a couple of lessons. |
|||
|
Engagement |
Will students’ attention
be gained early in the lesson? Will
their initial conceptions be solicited? |
10 |
8 |
|
Exploration |
Can you perceive a clear
guiding question/purpose for the lesson?
Will the students collect data or retrieve interesting data from
elsewhere? Are the instructions for
doing this clear? |
15 |
3 |
|
Explanation |
Will the students be able
to make sense of their exploration?
Are they asked to report what they learn? |
15 |
5 |
|
Elaboration |
Are there suggestions for
extending the lesson (e.g., for advanced students)? |
10 |
3 |
|
Evaluation |
Is there a mechanism for
evaluating students’ understandings?
Does that mechanism match the lesson’s objectives? |
15 |
13 |
|
DISCRETIONARY |
Any additional points you
wish to assign for especially good treatment in any section of the lesson
plan (maximum of 10) (2 points for being straight forward and informative) |
10 |
2 |
This lesson, while informative, leaves room for improvement. As a science teacher, it is often appropriate to demonstrate concepts visually through models and data collection. Simply answering questions and looking at pictures falls well short of this ideal goal. It is easy to have students memorize facts, but in my experience this is not helpful in the long run.
For all of its downfalls, this lesson does do a few things very well. For one, it makes it extremely easy for a teacher to gauge how much a student has learned. All he or she needs to do is check the child’s notebook. Furthermore, the objective of the lesson is quite clear: students will dismiss a variety of misconceptions dealing with astronomy. However, this is not a particularly engaging premise for a lesson.
This lesson does little to adhere to the national and state standards. However, it does support the research findings for inquiry. Particularly, it allows students to dismiss preconceived notions and replace them with the correct ideas. As a science teacher, this is an essential tool to ensure that a student is making strides in the classroom.
Overall, this is a good start towards an effective lesson. If a teacher were to add some elements of data collection and group learning, it could be quite effective. As stated in the lesson plan, the basic ideas learned in this lesson can be easily applied to such other subjects as art, history, and language arts. In my opinion, this would be a perfect lesson for K-5 students for its simple concepts and easy application.